Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2270599

ABSTRACT

Aim The present study aimed to estimate the anaphylaxis rates following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents in Europe. Methods We retrieved data on 371 anaphylaxis cases following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in children ≤ 17 years old notified to EudraVigilance as of October 8, 2022. Overall, 27,120,512 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine and 1,400,300 doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine have been delivered to children during the study period. Results The overall mean anaphylaxis rate was 12.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.49-14.12] per 106 mRNA vaccine doses [12.14 (95% CI: 6.37-17.91) per 106 doses for mRNA-1273 and 12.84 (95% CI: 11.49-14.19) per 106 doses for BNT162b2]. Children 12-17 years old accounted for 317 anaphylaxis cases, followed by 48 cases in children 3-11 years old, and 6 cases in children 0-2 years old. Children 10-17 years old had a mean anaphylaxis rate of 13.52 (95% CI: 12.03-15.00) cases per 106 mRNA vaccine doses and children 5-9 years old had a mean anaphylaxis rate of 9.51 (95% CI: 6.82-12.20) cases per 106 mRNA vaccine doses. There were two fatalities, both in the 12-17 years age group. The fatal anaphylaxis rate was 0.07 cases per 106 mRNA vaccine doses. Conclusions Anaphylaxis is a rare adverse event after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children. Continuous surveillance of serious adverse events is needed to guide vaccination policies as we move towards SARS-CoV-2 endemicity. Larger real-world studies on COVID-19 vaccination in children, using clinical case confirmation, are imperative.

2.
Vaccine ; 41(14): 2382-2386, 2023 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270600

ABSTRACT

AIM: The present study aimed to estimate the anaphylaxis rates following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents in Europe. METHODS: We retrieved data on 371 anaphylaxis cases following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in children ≤ 17 years old notified to EudraVigilance as of October 8, 2022. Overall, 27,120,512 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine and 1,400,300 doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine have been delivered to children during the study period. RESULTS: The overall mean anaphylaxis rate was 12.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.49-14.12] per 106 mRNA vaccine doses [12.14 (95% CI: 6.37-17.91) per 106 doses for mRNA-1273 and 12.84 (95% CI: 11.49-14.19) per 106 doses for BNT162b2]. Children 12-17 years old accounted for 317 anaphylaxis cases, followed by 48 cases in children 3-11 years old, and 6 cases in children 0-2 years old. Children 10-17 years old had a mean anaphylaxis rate of 13.52 (95% CI: 12.03-15.00) cases per 106 mRNA vaccine doses and children 5-9 years old had a mean anaphylaxis rate of 9.51 (95% CI: 6.82-12.20) cases per 106 mRNA vaccine doses. There were two fatalities, both in the 12-17 years age group. The fatal anaphylaxis rate was 0.07 cases per 106 mRNA vaccine doses. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis is a rare adverse event after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in children. Continuous surveillance of serious adverse events is needed to guide vaccination policies as we move towards SARS-CoV-2 endemicity. Larger real-world studies on COVID-19 vaccination in children, using clinical case confirmation, are imperative.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , RNA, Messenger
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(3)2023 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252779

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at producing an updated assessment of the incidence of anaphylaxis associated with COVID-19 vaccines based on pharmacovigilance data. Anaphylactic reaction and anaphylactic shock data post-COVID-19-vaccination reported from week 52, 2020 to week 1 or week 2, 2023 were collected from the VAERS and EudraVigilance databases, respectively, and analyzed comparatively. Incidence rates were calculated using the corresponding administered vaccine doses as denominators for all licensed vaccines and both platform types (mRNA or vectored). The latest data from the present analysis showed lower anaphylaxis incidence associated with COVID-19 vaccination compared to previous estimates from week 52, 2020 to week 39, 2021 (anaphylactic reaction: 8.96 (95% CI 8.80-9.11)/million doses overall (EEA: 14.19 (95% CI 13.92-14.47)/million/US: 3.17 (95% CI 3.03-3.31)/million); anaphylactic shock: 1.46 (95% CI 1.39-1.52)/million doses overall (EEA: 2.47 (95% CI 2.36-2.58)/million/US: 0.33 (95% CI 0.29-0.38)/million)). Incidence rates varied by vaccine and were higher as captured in EudraVigilance compared to the VAERS and for vectored compared to mRNA vaccines. Most reported cases had a favorable outcome. The extremely rare fatalities (overall rates across continents 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.06)/million doses for anaphylactic reaction and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.03)/million vaccine doses for anaphylactic shock) were also associated with vector-rather than mRNA-based vaccines. The diminished incidence of anaphylaxis post-vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines offers assurance about their safety, as does the continuous potential adverse events monitoring through specialized pharmacovigilance databases.

4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(2): e2255779, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243272

ABSTRACT

Importance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, children and adolescents were massively infected worldwide. In 2022, reinfections became a main feature of the endemic phase of SARS-CoV-2, so it is important to understand the epidemiology and clinical impact of reinfections. Objective: To assess the incidence, risk, and severity of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used epidemiologic data of documented SARS-CoV-2 infections from the surveillance database of the Institute for Public Health of Vojvodina. A total of 32 524 children and adolescents from Vojvodina, Serbia, with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 6, 2020, and April 30, 2022, were followed up for reinfection until July 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence rates of documented SARS-CoV-2 reinfection per 1000 person-months, estimated risk of documented reinfection 90 days or more after laboratory confirmation of primary infection, reinfection severity, hospitalizations, and deaths. Results: The study cohort included 32 524 children and adolescents with COVID-19 (mean [SD] age, 11.2 [4.9] years; 15 953 [49.1%] male), including 964 children (3.0%) who experienced documented reinfection. The incidence rate of documented reinfections was 3.2 (95% CI, 3.0-3.4) cases per 1000 person-months and was highest in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (3.4; 95% CI, 3.2-3.7). Most reinfections (905 [93.9%]) were recorded in 2022. The cumulative reinfection risk was 1.3% at 6 months, 1.9% at 9 months, 4.0% at 12 months, 6.7% at 15 months, 7.2% at 18 months, and 7.9% after 21 months. Pediatric COVID-19 cases were generally mild. The proportion of severe clinical forms decreased from 14 (1.4%) in initial episodes to 3 (0.3%) in reinfections. Reinfected children were approximately 5 times less likely to have severe disease during reinfection compared with initial infection (McNemar odds ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-0.8). Pediatric reinfections rarely led to hospitalization (0.5% vs 1.3% during primary infections), and none resulted in death. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that the SARS-CoV-2 reinfection risk remained substantially lower for children and adolescents compared with adults as of July 2022. Pediatric infections were mild, and reinfections were even milder than primary infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Adolescent , Child , Male , Humans , Female , Serbia/epidemiology , Incidence , COVID-19/epidemiology , Reinfection , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 9(2)2023 Feb 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231712

ABSTRACT

Candida auris has recently emerged as a multidrug-resistant yeast implicated in various healthcare-associated invasive infections and hospital outbreaks. In the current study, we report the first five intensive care unit (ICU) cases affected by C. auris isolates in Greece, during October 2020-January 2022. The ICU of the hospital was converted to a COVID-19 unit on 25 February 2021, during the third wave of COVID-19 in Greece. Identification of the isolates was confirmed by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF]. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by the EUCAST broth microdilution method. Based on the tentative CDC MIC breakpoints, all five C. auris isolates were resistant to fluconazole (≥32 µg/mL), while three of them exhibited resistance to amphotericin B (≥2 µg/mL). The environmental screening also revealed the dissemination of C. auris in the ICU. Molecular characterization of C. auris clinical and environmental isolates was performed by MultiLocus Sequence Typing (MLST) of a set of four genetic loci, namely ITS, D1/D2, RPB1 and RPB2, encoding for the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of the ribosomal subunit, the large ribosomal subunit region and the RNA polymerase II largest subunit, respectively. MLST analysis showed that all isolates possessed identical sequences in the four genetic loci and clustered with the South Asian clade I strains. Additionally, PCR amplification and sequencing of the CJJ09_001802 genetic locus, encoding for the "nucleolar protein 58" that contains clade-specific repeats was performed. Sanger sequence analysis of the TCCTTCTTC repeats within CJJ09_001802 locus also assigned the C. auris isolates to the South Asian clade I. Our study confirms that C. auris is an emerging yeast pathogen in our region, especially in the setting of the ongoing COVID-19 worldwide pandemic. Adherence to strict infection control is needed to restrain further spread of the pathogen.

6.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(11): 1691-1696, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1927217

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The novel mRNA vaccines proved to be safe and effective in averting severe COVID-19. Vaccine-related complications recorded by pharmacovigilance systems, such as 'EudraVigilance' in Europe and 'VAERS' in the United States (US), rarely include myocarditis and pericarditis. Given the novelty of the platform and the increasing global-scale vaccine production needs, we assessed their reporting rates comparatively across continents. METHODS: Data of myocarditis and pericarditis cases post COVID-19 vaccination reported from week 52/2020 (December 21 to 27, 2020) to week 40/2021 (October 4 to 10, 2021) were collected for mRNA vaccines from EudraVigilance and VAERS. The corresponding administered vaccine doses were used as denominators to estimate reporting rates for comparison purposes. Cross-tabulation analysis was employed to compare the reporting rates of mRNA vaccines-associated myocarditis and pericarditis between EudraVigilance and VAERS. RESULTS: Low reporting rates of myocarditis (7.64/million vaccine doses) and pericarditis (5.32/million) were found, with higher rates of both disorders in EudraVigilance compared to VAERS; these differences were more pronounced post-mRNA-1273 (5-6-fold, p=0.000 for myocarditis and p<0.001 for pericarditis) than post-BNT162b2 vaccination (1.5-2-fold, p<0.001 for both conditions). Most myocarditis cases occurred in males <30 years. Pericarditis affected predominantly males <40 and both sexes >40 years. The extremely rare fatalities related to myocarditis (0.102/million) or pericarditis (0.017/million) were also higher in EudraVigilance versus VAERS. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the underlying causes of the observed differences could provide guidance for the enhanced quality of mRNA vaccines that would also foster vaccine acceptance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Vaccines , Female , Humans , Male , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Myocarditis/complications , Pericarditis/epidemiology , Pericarditis/etiology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects
7.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 20: 100453, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1914783

ABSTRACT

Background: Data on the rate and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in real-world settings are scarce and the effects of vaccine boosters on reinfection risk are unknown. Methods: In a population-level observational study, registered SARS-CoV-2 laboratory-confirmed Vojvodina residents, between March 6, 2020 and October 31, 2021, were followed for reinfection ≥90 days after primary infection. Data were censored at the end of follow-up (January 31, 2022) or death. The reinfection risk was visualized with Kaplan-Meier plots. To examine the protective effect of vaccination, the subset of individuals with primary infection in 2020 (March 6-December 31) were matched (1:2) with controls without reinfection. Findings: Until January 31, 2022, 13,792 reinfections were recorded among 251,104 COVID-19 primary infections (5.49%). Most reinfections (86.77%, 11,967/13,792) were recorded in January 2022. Reinfections were mostly mild (99.17%, 13,678/13,792). Hospitalizations were uncommon [1.08% (149/13,792) vs. 3.66% (505/13,792) in primary infection] and COVID-19 deaths were very rare (20/13,792, case fatality rate 0.15%). The overall incidence rate of reinfections was 5.99 (95% CI 5.89-6.09) per 1000 person-months. The reinfection risk was estimated as 0.76% at six months, 1.36% at nine months, 4.96% at 12 months, 16.68% at 15 months, and 18.86% at 18 months. Unvaccinated (OR=1.23; 95%CI=1.14-1.33), incompletely (OR=1.33; 95%CI=1.08-1.64) or completely vaccinated (OR=1.50; 95%CI=1.37-1.63), were modestly more likely to be reinfected compared with recipients of a third (booster) vaccine dose. Interpretation: SARS-CoV-2 reinfections were uncommon until the end of 2021 but became common with the advent of Omicron. Very few reinfections were severe. Boosters may modestly reduce reinfection risk. Funding: No specific funding was obtained for this study.

8.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0266958, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1883683

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to examine the associations with epidemiological, behavioral and clinical parameters of IgG antibody responses against the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) after immunization with two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs, n = 439) in Greece. We used a mixed effects model to investigate the potential associations of antibody levels one and three months after vaccination and examined by bootstrapping t-tests the putative effects of gender and age for each period. We also employed exact tests of independence in R × C contingency tables to explore associations between behavioral and gender variables with vaccinations side effects. We found significant differences between males and females as well as between subjects in the youngest (21-30 years) and the older age groups in both study periods. We also detected a decrease in titers with age and time. Males had steeper elimination rates across the age span in both periods, in contrast to females who exhibited a softer elimination titer rate with age in the first period and almost constant titers in the second. Concerning side effects, we found a significant association between pain at the injection site and female sex. Hence, our real-world data analyses revealed potentially important clues into the associations of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike. We discuss the importance of these findings in view of current mass vaccination perspectives and provide useful clues for the design and optimal timing of booster doses for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibody Formation , COVID-19 , Aged , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
9.
Int J Cardiol ; 358: 136-139, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1796722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complications following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly with mRNA vaccines, rarely include myocarditis and pericarditis. This work principally aimed at defining a realistic temporal relationship between vaccination and myocarditis/pericarditis development. METHODS: All relevant cases reported from week 52/2020 through week 41/2021 in the VAERS database were retrieved and analyzed for licensed vaccines. These included BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and AD26.COV2·S. Incidence rates were calculated using the corresponding administered vaccine doses as denominators. Additionally, analyzed parameters included demographics, dose series, hospitalization length and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 2016 myocarditis and 1380 pericarditis cases, (4.96/106 and 3.40/106 administered vaccine doses, respectively), were recorded. Most myocarditis cases occurred following BNT162b2 (5.60/106 doses) in males <30 years. Pericarditis affected predominantly males <40, both sexes >40 years, and was most common post AD26.COV2·S (4.78/106 doses). Hospitalization was required for 40.3% and 27.2% of myocarditis and pericarditis cases, respectively. A bimodal pattern was found for both myocarditis and pericarditis, with two peaks that coincided temporally, but were reversed in intensity. The first peak was recorded 1-3 days post-vaccination and was more pronounced in myocarditis, while the second was recorded 15-30 days post-vaccination and was more intense in pericarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Myocarditis/pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and depicts a bimodal pattern.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Ad26COVS1 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Myocarditis/complications , Myocarditis/etiology , Pericarditis/diagnosis , Pericarditis/epidemiology , Pericarditis/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
10.
J Pers Med ; 12(3)2022 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742520

ABSTRACT

Several vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were developed and made available in a record time, just over a year after the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [...].

11.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(3)2022 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1705081

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes direct damage to the pulmonary epithelium, enabling Aspergillus invasion. Rapid progression and high mortality of invasive aspergillosis have been reported. In the present study, we report a rare case of possible COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) caused by A. niger in a Greek patient. Diagnosis was based on ECMM/ISHAM specific criteria and the new algorithm "BM-AspICU" for the invasive pulmonary aspergillosis diagnostic strategy. The fungal isolate was recovered in a non-bronchoalveolar lavage (non-BAL) sample and its identification was performed by standard macroscopic and microscopic morphological studies. MALDI-TOF analysis confirmed the identification of A. niger. In addition, galactomannan antigen and Aspergillus real-time PCR testing were positive in the non-BAL sample, while in serum they proved negative. The A. niger isolate showed an MIC for fluconazole ≥128 µg/mL, for itraconazole and posaconazole 0.25 µg/mL, for voriconazole 0.5 µg/mL, for flucytosine 4 µg/mL, for amphotericin B 1 µg/mL, and for all echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin) >8 µg/mL. The patient was initially treated with voriconazole; amphotericin B was subsequently added, when a significant progression of cavitation was demonstrated on chest computed tomography. A. niger was not isolated in subsequent samples and the patient's unfavorable outcome was attributed to septic shock caused by a pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain.

13.
Vaccine ; 40(2): 183-186, 2022 01 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1537111

ABSTRACT

We retrieved data on 8940 anaphylaxis cases post-COVID-19 vaccination from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and the European EudraVigilance from week 52/2020 through week 31/2021 and compared them with those of other vaccines. Overall, 837,830,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses were delivered in the US and Europe during the study period, for which the vaccine name was known. The mean anaphylaxis rate was estimated at 10.67 cases per 106 doses of COVID-19 vaccines (range: 7.99-19.39 cases per 106 doses depending on the vaccine). COVID-19 vaccines ranked fifth in reported anaphylaxis rates, behind rabies, tick-borne encephalitis, measles-mumps-rubella-varicella, and human papillomavirus vaccines (70.77, 20, 19.8, and 13.65 cases per 106 vaccine doses, respectively). COVID-19 vaccines are within the range of anaphylaxis rates reported across several common vaccines in these two passive reporting systems. These data should be communicated to reassure the general population about the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Infant , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Mumps Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 22863, 2021 11 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1532102

ABSTRACT

The most widely used test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is a PCR test. PCR has very high sensitivity and is able to detect very low amounts of RNA. However, many individuals receiving a positive test result in a context of a PCR-based surveillance might be infected with SARS-CoV-2, but they are not contagious at the time of the test. The question arises regards if the cost effective, portable rapid antigen tests (RATs) have a better performance than PCR in identification of infectious individuals. In this direction, we examined the diagnostic performance of RATs from 14 different manufacturers in 400 clinical samples with known rRT-PCR cycles threshold (cT) and 50 control samples. Substantial variability was observed in the limit of detection (LOD) of different RATs (cT = 26.8-34.7). The fluorescence-based RAT exhibited a LOD of cT = 34.7. The use of the most effective RATs leads to true positive rates (sensitivities) of 99.1% and 90.9% for samples with cT ≤ 30 and cT ≤ 33, respectively, percentages that can guarantee a sensitivity high enough to identify contagious patients. RAT testing may also substantially reduce the quarantine period for infected individuals without compromising personal or public safety.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antigens, Viral/analysis , COVID-19/immunology , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Humans , Immunologic Tests , Limit of Detection , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
J Med Virol ; 94(4): 1465-1472, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1527443

ABSTRACT

We studied the third coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave in Athens metropolitan area (3 738 901 inhabitants) through two seroepidemiological surveys. Persons presenting in 12 healthcare facilities across Athens in March and June 2021 were studied (764 and 901, respectively). Immunoglobulin G antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein were measured by a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. In March the seroprevalence rate was 11.6%, meaning that 435 208 residents of Athens had evidence of immunity. The respective values in June were 55.7% and 2 082 568 residents. The highest seroprevalence rates attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded in persons <18 years (16.3% in March and 31.6% in June), while immunity was mainly vaccine-induced in persons 18-64 years and >65 years. Infection-attributed immunity also increased in older-age groups. Wide ranges in seroprevalence rates were noted across areas in March and June. The highest seroprevalence rates were recorded in Piraeus (47.2%) and West Attica (37.5%). However, the highest increase (>5 times) occurred in Piraeus and the South Section of Athens, which are among the most densely populated areas in Athens. In both study periods, history of COVID-19 or febrile episode, and having a cohabitant with COVID-19 were associated with increased risk for seropositivity among unvaccinated persons (p values <0.001 for all). Residing in Piraeus, the South Section or West Attica was associated with increased risk for seropositivity in June (p values <0.001). Wide heterogeneity in seroprevalence rates was found across areas in Athens, which is mainly attributed to population density. The impact of population mobility and socioeconomic status should be explored.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Young Adult
16.
Vaccine ; 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1451636

ABSTRACT

<h4>Background</h4> COVID-19 vaccines were efficacious and safe in clinical trials. We report nine events of acute pericarditis (AP) in eight patients following COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (6/9), AZD1222 (2/9) and mRNA-1273 (1/9). <h4>Methods</h4> All patients were referred for AP temporally linked with COVID-19 vaccination. Chest pain was the most common clinical manifestation. Alternative etiologies were excluded upon thorough diagnostic work up. AP diagnosis was established according to ESC guidelines. <h4>Findings</h4> Five events occurred after the first vaccine dose and four after the second. The mean age in this cohort was 65.8±10.2 years and the men/women ratio 3/5. All events resolved without sequelae;two events were complicated by cardiac tamponade requiring emergent pericardial decompression. Hospitalization was required in four cases. <h4>Interpretation</h4> Although causality cannot be firmly established, AP has emerged as a possible complication following COVID-19 vaccination. Further investigation is indispensable to fully characterize this new entity.

17.
Future Microbiol ; 16: 455-459, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1389071

ABSTRACT

Tweetable abstract An opinion on the coronaviruses' evolution paradoxes, the continuing adaptation of the SARS-CoV-2 in humans following the zoonotic transmission, and clues into escape routes from host immune responses.


Subject(s)
Evolution, Molecular , Immune Evasion , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Genome, Viral , Humans
18.
Future Microbiol ; 15: 1201-1206, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1389069

ABSTRACT

Tweetable abstract The reopening of schools in the fall entails risks given the controversies in pediatric COVID-19 pathogenesis and the ambiguous role of children in transmission.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Psychological Distance , Schools , Aerosols , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Child , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Students
19.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(11): 1435-1437, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1372864

ABSTRACT

Contamination of surfaces has been implicated in transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We tested by real-time PCR for SARS-CoV-2 contamination environmental samples from three hospitals during the peak of the third pandemic wave. Overall, 19 of 463 (4.1%) samples tested positive: 12 of 173 (6.9%) samples from a COVID-19 hospital, 3 of 177 (1.7%) samples from a non-COVID-19 hospital, and 4 of 113 (3.5%) samples from a pediatric hospital with dedicated COVID-19 clinics. Most positive samples originated from emergency departments (EDs) (47.3%) and the intensive care units (ICUs) (26.3%) of the COVID-19 hospital. Positive samples belonged almost exclusively (18/19) to the highly transmissible B.1.1.7 cluster, that might explain environmental contamination at this stage of the pandemic. The frequency and efficiency of disinfection in high-risk patient areas, such as EDs and ICUs, should be reinforced, especially during this period where highly transmissible variants of concern are widespread.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL